Skeptical Dinklage

11 Responses to “Skeptical Dinklage”

1. 

   odds December 11, 2012 at 6:49 pm #

   the dude is famous.

   fame is the ultimate alpha trump card

   Reply
   • 

     delicioustacos December 11, 2012 at 6:54 pm #

     I think the Dink met his alluring wife (pictured) on the theatre scene before his fame. But also: when he was broke and eating shit, he refused to demean himself by playing some bullshit Christmas elf in an ad:

     http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/01/magazine/peter-dinklage-was-smart-to-say-no.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

     Balls is the ultimate trump card. And Dinklage’s sac is the size of a god damn zeppelin.

     DINKLAGE!!!

     Reply
     • 

       Anonymous December 11, 2012 at 8:16 pm #

       As a short dude who recently had a nascent relationship go sour, this post is exactly what I needed. Also, I need more balls.
     • 

       Spoos in August December 11, 2012 at 8:27 pm #

       It’s hard for women to love self-deprecating men. (Which means hipsters will die out in a generation or two.)

       Anon says: “Also, I need more balls.”

       Speaking for myself, two is fine, but we could all use bigger balls.
     • 

       Anonymous December 12, 2012 at 12:36 am #

       Speaking for myself, hipsters can’t die out soon enough.
2. 

   dressyarson December 11, 2012 at 9:19 pm #

   ~99.9999% fewer women are interested in fucking Peter Dinklage than an equivalent male celebrity who isn’t a dwarf. Being short is a tremendous obstacle to attracting women. This obstacle is surmountable with other qualities and effort, but that doesn’t make it a non-issue.

   If we could objectively assess mate-value, four inches of height would be worth like twenty IQ points, two inches of penis length, or 30k/year of income.

   Reply
   • 

     Anonymous December 12, 2012 at 12:16 am #

     Depends on where you start with height, IQ, and income. They all have diminishing returns. Why am I fucking commenting on this anyway.

     Reply
   • 

     sylviasarah December 13, 2012 at 10:55 am #

     Even though it’s a show, watching him screw all those chicks makes him kind of hot. Imho. I think it’s just that the idea of him as a sex object doesn’t come into mind as immediately as with some guy that I would look at and turn and giggle because he’s so cute. But when that idea is there…boy does it stick.

     Reply
3. 

   The Real Vince December 13, 2012 at 10:57 pm #

   If Dinklage were six feet tall, holding fame and looks constant,he would absolutely crush an unending supply of primo pussy. For men, height is one of the most important factors in the mating game.

   I know a guy who’s 5’6″ jacked as hell, and he says he’d trade his muscles to be skinny-fat six-footer.

   Reply
   • 

     Anonymous December 14, 2012 at 2:05 pm #

     Re: “If Dinklage were six feet tall, holding fame and looks constant,he would absolutely crush an unending supply of primo pussy.” Nobody is perfect, but Dinklage does the best he can with what he has, something very very few of us do. And Dinklage has done well. We all can do well; it’s only our “limiting beliefs”, as the PUA community call them, that hold us back.

     As for your short friend, the grass is always greener on the other side. You should see the sort of chicks my buff, short, average-looking former roommate used to take home. But that’s besides the point. The point is, who cares. You can’t do the experiment where abracadabra! your friend is a skinny six foot tall dude! and then see if he beds more women. Like Dinklage, he should make peace with what he has and do the best he can with what he has.

     Reply
4. 

   Cakes and Shakes... December 19, 2012 at 12:14 pm #

   Or she has a … you know… fetish for achondroplasiacs – doesn’t mean he isn’t naturally gifted with the wimmenz though.

   Reply